Results here: http://www.ehechockey.com/schedule.php
Standings here: http://www.ehechockey.com/standings.php
League leaders here: http://www.ehechockey.com/leagueleaders.php
League file here: http://www.ehechockey.com/ehec.zip
PHI 5 - NJ 3
LA 5 - WSH 1
CAR 4 - WPG 3
BOS 4 - CBJ 3
OTT 5 - BUF 3
SJ 6 - TB 2
DAL 5 - STL 1
EDM 3 - ANA 1
February 16, 2016
Moderator: SharksGM
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: February 16, 2016
Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: February 16, 2016
It was pointed out to me that this statement is nonsensical so, to clarify, the 67,360,616 is their to-date rather than their current. They're currently at 70,421,250.Vik (Habs) wrote:Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Guess that's what happens when you try to post things during a commercial time out.
- SharksGM
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8539
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: February 16, 2016
You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
Also, don't you have Chicago way over? Cause I definitely do.
Re: February 16, 2016
I am under. After I dropped to 22 players after each of my trades.
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: February 16, 2016
Pretty sure Nashville's guaranteed to be under once they demote guys.SharksGM wrote:You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).