February 16, 2016

Moderator: SharksGM

Post Reply
User avatar
Commish Bub(NYR)
Posts: 6507
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
Location: Maine

February 16, 2016

Post by Commish Bub(NYR) »

Results here: http://www.ehechockey.com/schedule.php

Standings here: http://www.ehechockey.com/standings.php

League leaders here: http://www.ehechockey.com/leagueleaders.php

League file here: http://www.ehechockey.com/ehec.zip

PHI 5 - NJ 3
LA 5 - WSH 1
CAR 4 - WPG 3
BOS 4 - CBJ 3
OTT 5 - BUF 3
SJ 6 - TB 2
DAL 5 - STL 1
EDM 3 - ANA 1
User avatar
Vik (Habs)
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm

Re: February 16, 2016

Post by Vik (Habs) »

Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
User avatar
Vik (Habs)
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm

Re: February 16, 2016

Post by Vik (Habs) »

Vik (Habs) wrote:Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
It was pointed out to me that this statement is nonsensical so, to clarify, the 67,360,616 is their to-date rather than their current. They're currently at 70,421,250.

Guess that's what happens when you try to post things during a commercial time out.
User avatar
SharksGM
Site Admin
Posts: 8539
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: February 16, 2016

Post by SharksGM »

Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).

Also, don't you have Chicago way over? Cause I definitely do.
BlackHawk Down (Seb)

Re: February 16, 2016

Post by BlackHawk Down (Seb) »

I am under. After I dropped to 22 players after each of my trades.
User avatar
Vik (Habs)
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm

Re: February 16, 2016

Post by Vik (Habs) »

SharksGM wrote:
Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).
You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).
Pretty sure Nashville's guaranteed to be under once they demote guys.
Post Reply

Return to “2015-16 EHEC Regular Season”