Eastside's Hockey Elite Collide

Results here: http://www.ehechockey.com/schedule.php

Standings here: http://www.ehechockey.com/standings.php

League leaders here: http://www.ehechockey.com/leagueleaders.php

League file here: http://www.ehechockey.com/ehec.zip

PHI 5 - NJ 3
LA 5 - WSH 1
CAR 4 - WPG 3
BOS 4 - CBJ 3
OTT 5 - BUF 3
SJ 6 - TB 2
DAL 5 - STL 1
EDM 3 - ANA 1

Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).

Vik (Habs) wrote:Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).

It was pointed out to me that this statement is nonsensical so, to clarify, the 67,360,616 is their to-date rather than their current. They're currently at 70,421,250.

Guess that's what happens when you try to post things during a commercial time out.

Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).

You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).

Also, don't you have Chicago way over? Cause I definitely do.

I am under. After I dropped to 22 players after each of my trades.

SharksGM wrote:

Vik (Habs) wrote:Nashville's over the contract limit.
Edmonton' still over the cap (at 67,360,616, needs to be 69,675,677 or less).
Nashville's over the cap (at 69,451,000, needs to be 68,208,747 or less).

You mean 69.451M after subtracting LTIR? I still have them under even with 24 players on the roster (although I'm not sure that I actually count more than 24 salaries... not that it matters because you can't play a game with 24+ players anyway).

Pretty sure Nashville's guaranteed to be under once they demote guys.