Page 1 of 1
February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:24 am
by Virtual Jarmo
CAN 5 - USA 1
Shots: 39-14 CAN
PP: CAN - 2/8; USA - 0/0
no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------
29:59 1-0 CAN Steven Stamkos [35] (Eric Staal, Alex Pietrangelo)PP
30:38 2-0 CAN Shea Weber [12] (Dion Phaneuf)
33:49 3-0 CAN Jarome Iginla [38] (Eric Staal, Jason Spezza)PP
35:11 4-0 CAN Mike Richards [26] (Steven Stamkos, Jordan Staal)
------------------------------------------------------------
45:56 4-1 USA Zach Bogosian [4] (David Backes, James van Riemsdyk)
47:28 5-1 CAN Eric Staal [32] (Rick Nash, Shea Weber)
------------------------------------------------------------
Three stars:
1st: Eric Staal
2nd: Shea Weber
3rd: Steven Stamkos
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:26 am
by Virtual Jarmo
After managing just four shots in the first period, Canada decides to start playing and the country can rejoice for beating those evil, awful, horrible Americans.
http://www.ehechockey.com/Olympics.zip
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:08 am
by Penguin
Whoever did the file has a huge man crush on Eric Staal!
Good job Canada!
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:05 am
by Singin the BLUES
Son of a bitch........figured maybe USA would have a hope in hell in EHM Olympics but I guess not.......good win for Canada........Most GMs had Team USA writen off here.......I guess I showed them wrong
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:06 pm
by Parker
Well, that's a relief - I won't have to listen all the "why didn't you name [insert floater here] to Team Canada's roster?" trash talk.
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:06 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
Singin the BLUES wrote:Son of a bitch........figured maybe USA would have a hope in hell in EHM Olympics but I guess not.......good win for Canada........Most GMs had Team USA writen off here.......I guess I showed them wrong
Even with you picking the team, USA still had the 2nd best team......nobody was going to beat Canada, quite obvious.
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:20 pm
by Singin the BLUES
Well I had comments from others GMs thinking I would be about 3rd - 5th......just very glad I dud better then the Russians did....
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:24 pm
by SharksGM
Parker wrote:Well, that's a relief - I won't have to listen all the "why didn't you name [insert floater here] to Team Canada's roster?" trash talk.
As if, EHEC could probably make three team Canadas and have them sweep the medals.
Besides, wasn't Jordan Staal actually on the team?
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:10 pm
by Virtual Jarmo
Hate to be a hater, but I wonder if the US could have pulled the upset with some of the American-born created guys from the last few draft classes.
Not second guessing Jim's team. Just wondering if it could have happened.
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:33 am
by Montreal Canadiens
Singin the BLUES wrote:Well I had comments from others GMs thinking I would be about 3rd - 5th......just very glad I dud better then the Russians did....
Are you drunk? We both lost to Canada.
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:05 am
by Singin the BLUES
Last I checked.....silver was higher then bronze
Re: February 23, 2014
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:00 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
Singin the BLUES wrote:Last I checked.....silver was higher then bronze
You really are just a completely lost human aren't you......you faced Sweden in the quarters....I faced Canada.....hence why the Russians won bronze....you think if you faced Canada in quarters and I faced Sweden, the ultra "important" medal placings would be different? Not that it even matters, this was completely for fun.