Eastside's Hockey Elite Collide

BOS 4 - TOR 1
Shots: 32-8 BOS
PP: BOS - 3/6; TOR - 0/2

19:08 1-0 BOS Dennis Wideman [4] (Phil Kessel)PP
------------------------------------------------------------
20:46 2-0 BOS Tomas Fleischmann [22] (Andrej Meszaros, Dennis Wideman)PP
31:29 3-0 BOS Rene Bourque [3] (Jamie Langenbrunner, Zach Hamill)
------------------------------------------------------------
46:21 3-1 TOR Taylor Hall [28])SH
48:05 4-1 BOS Milan Lucic [41] (Andrej Meszaros, Dennis Wideman)PP
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Dennis Wideman
2nd: Andrej Meszaros
3rd: Rene Bourque

Farm result: Providence 4 - Toronto 3

NYR 4 - NJ 1
Shots: 20-15 NYR
PP: NYR - 1/5; NJ - 0/4

no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------
no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------
45:03 1-0 NYR Jim Slater [12] (Trent Hunter, Rostislav Klesla)
47:38 1-1 NJ Mattias Tedenby [20])SH
57:24 2-1 NYR Paul Kariya [14] (Patrick Marleau, Jason Arnott)
59:43 3-1 NYR Patrick Marleau [17] (Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Michael Del Zotto)PP
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Patrick Marleau
2nd: Jason Arnott
3rd: Jim Slater

Farm result: Connecticut - Albany 0

TB 0 - BUF 3
Shots: 20-20
PP: TB - 0/3; BUF - 1/2

13:33 0-1 BUF Drew Stafford [18] (Ryan Johansen, Jason Pominville)
------------------------------------------------------------
30:47 0-2 BUF Derek Roy [22] (Ryan Johansen, Zack Kassian)
32:41 0-3 BUF Ryan Johansen [19])PP
------------------------------------------------------------
no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Jhonas Enroth
2nd: Ryan Johansen
3rd: Zack Kassian

Farm result: Norfolk 1 - Rochester 2

DET 1 - WSH 3
Shots: 21-15 WSH
PP: DET - 1/2; WSH - 1/3

05:24 0-1 WSH Pavel Datsyuk [26] (Alexander Ovechkin, Olli Jokinen)PP
08:28 1-1 DET Corey Perry [33] (Andrei Loktionov, Jakub Kindl)PP
------------------------------------------------------------
27:41 1-2 WSH Pavel Datsyuk [27] (Andrei Markov)
------------------------------------------------------------
47:47 1-3 WSH Alexander Ovechkin [31] (Nikita Gusev)
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Pavel Datsyuk
2nd: Alexander Ovechkin
3rd: Simeon Varlamov

Farm result: Grand Rapids 3 - Hershey 2

MIN 1 - VAN 3
Shots: 25-21 VAN
PP: MIN - 0/1; VAN - 0/0

19:37 0-1 VAN Guillaume Latendresse [13] (Evan Oberg, Yann Sauve)
------------------------------------------------------------
23:46 0-2 VAN Brenden Morrow [26] (Mike Cammalleri, Jordan Schroeder)
32:11 1-2 MIN Alexei Marchenko [10] (Marc Methot, Ian White)
35:42 1-3 VAN Daniel Sedin [24] (Aaron Ward, Shane O'Brien)
------------------------------------------------------------
no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Guillaume Latendresse
2nd: Roberto Luongo
3rd: Brenden Morrow

Farm result: Houston 4 - Chicago 1

SJ 3 - ANA 1
Shots: 18-16 ANA
PP: SJ - 0/0; ANA - 0/2

19:43 1-0 SJ Dany Heatley [35] (Joe Thornton, Nicklas Lidström)
------------------------------------------------------------
32:12 1-1 ANA Henrik Zetterberg [20] (Ryan Whitney)
33:16 2-1 SJ Dany Heatley [36] (Erik Cole, Michal Rozsival)
------------------------------------------------------------
57:03 3-1 SJ Erik Cole [21] (Dany Heatley)
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st: Dany Heatley
2nd: Erik Cole
3rd: Tomas Filippi

Farm result: Worcester 3 - Syracuse 1

Was concerned as the NZT TB employs was giving me some early test sim issues, but made a few changes and am happy with how they worked out. And Rochester has been on a tear!

Okay seriously, what the fuck is wrong with the officiating?

SabresGM wrote:Was concerned as the NZT TB employs was giving me some early test sim issues, but made a few changes and am happy with how they worked out. And Rochester has been on a tear!

You mean C+P my tactics with a more experienced team and deeper roster?

Tampa Bay GM wrote:

SabresGM wrote:Was concerned as the NZT TB employs was giving me some early test sim issues, but made a few changes and am happy with how they worked out. And Rochester has been on a tear!

You mean C+P my tactics with a more experienced team and deeper roster?

Changed my tactics about ten times, because I was getting killed when the first line wasn't on NZT. Wouldn't call it a C+P, as the only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardless because that wasn't producing anything, and Mayers and Huselius each had two shots, more than their last three games combined.

Where did my power play come from? How the shit does this make sense?

7 points up on LA with 10 games to go, I like my chances. We'll see how the first of 3 remaining meetings goes tomorrow in LA - you'd gotta think a win there seals the deal.

I'm a little confused as to why Poni, Skille & Sturm played nearly 20 minutes each despite performing poorly. That's an unseemly number of 4 & 5 ratings.

On a more positive note, Worcester wins with 3 goals on 5 shots as Kyle Wellwood's march to a 110 point season continues

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

only line that got adjusted tactic wise for this game specifically was the first one, cause the 4th was getting changed from R&G regardles

damn Boston and the Rangers win

What are you trying to get at, TB?

Bruins_GM wrote:Where did my power play come from? How the shit does this make sense?

EHM playing the "balance" game and messing with your mind. It's how I can go 1/23 over a stretch of games, then 4/8 in one game and maintain my 16% PP.

SabresGM wrote:What are you trying to get at, TB?

You plagiarised his highly original tactics, now you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal.

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

you get zero on the whole assignment and you have to go see the principal

I didn't realize NZT/H&G/NZT/H&G was copyrighted.

Nothing was done illegally, nothing was done outside the current rules of EHEC. No proof can be made that Greg, in any way, shape or form, even went and looked at your lineup or the tactics.

I have asked Quinn to take down the lineups pages in the event that teams are looking and uploading their lines after knowing what the opposition is doing. He's been too busy with school, but now that we're under 10 games left in the season, I'll be asking him again (Or, well, consider this me asking you, Quinn), especially with the playoffs on the horizon.

As far as I see it, the "more experienced team with the deeper roster" won the game.

Moving on...

Maybe nothing was done against the rules, but perhaps you should consider that somebody's feelings were hurt!

No hair pulling.

CapsGM wrote:

Awesome.